Editor’s Summary: Ghorum moves to involve the House in the appointment of the Treasurer. Pinkney and Sherman opposed it as favoring the larger states. Mason desired it might be considered to whom the money would belong; if to the people, the legislature representing the people ought to appoint the keepers of it.
To declare the law and punishment of piracies and felonies at sea considered and thought best to be the duty of the national congress, not the states; and this, said Madison, for the sake of uniformity and stability in the law for U.S. citizens at sea. Also the duty of the national congress: declaring the law and punishment of counterfeiting the securities and current coin of the United States, and offences against the law of Nations.
As to granting the Federal Government power to suppress rebellions and insurrections among the states: Langdon said the apprehension of the national force, will have a salutary effect in preventing insurrections. Morris addressing objections that desired the federal armies only to act upon request of an individual state legislature, responded: “We are acting a very strange part. We first form a strong man to protect us, and at the same time wish to tie his hands behind him, The [National] legislature may surely be trusted with such a power to preserve the public tranquility.” Madison and Dickinson both wanted an explanatory note that this power applied to state rebellions against the United States as well. Agreed upon nem con (that means of one mind, without dissent, or by unanimous vote) – but another point to consider for those who falsely claim the Founders created a Constitution that would permit a state to leave the Union at will.
Madison moves to strike the word “make” and insert the word “declare” as to Congress’s war powers. “Declare” was the right word so as to indicate that the President possessed the power to “repel sudden attacks” without the consent of Congress.
Art VII. Sect. 1. 1, 2 resumed. on the clause “to appoint 3 Treasurer by ballot.”
Mr. GHORUM moved to insert “joint” before ballot, as more convenient as well as reasonable, than to require the separate concurrence of the Senate.
Mr. PINKNEY 2ds. the motion. Mr. SHERMAN opposed it as favoring the larger States.
Mr. READ moved to strike out the clause, leaving the appointment of the Treasurer as of other officers to the Executive. The Legislature was an improper body for appointments. Those of the State legislatures were a proof of it. The Executive being responsible would make a good choice.
Mr. MERCER 2ds. the motion of Mr. Read.
On the motion for inserting the word “joint” before ballot N. H. ay. Mas. ay. Ct. no. N. J. no. Pa. ay. Md. no. Va. ay. N. C. ay. S. C. ay. Geo. ay. 4
Col. MASON in opposition to Mr. Reads motion desired it might be considered to whom the money would belong; if to the people, the legislature representing the people ought to appoint the keepers of it.
On striking out the clause as amended by inserting “Joint” N. H. no. Mas. no. Ct. no. Pa. ay. Del. ay. Md. ay. Va. no. N. C. no. S. C. ay. Geo. no. 5
6 “To constitute inferior tribunals” 7 agreed to nem. con. 8
“To make rules as to captures on land & water” — do. d 9, 6 “To declare the law and punishment of piracies and felonies &c” &c 10 considered.
Mr. MADISON moved to strike out “and punishment” &c. 11
Mr. MASON doubts the safety of it, considering the strict rule of construction in criminal cases. He doubted also the propriety of taking the power in all these cases wholly from the States.
Mr. GOVERNr. MORRIS thought it would be necessary to extend the authority farther, so as to provide for the punishment of counterfeiting in general. Bills of exchange for example might be forged in one State and carried into another:
It was suggested by some other member that foreign paper might be counterfeited by Citizens; and that it might be politic to provide by national authority for the punishment of it.
Mr. RANDOLPH did not conceive that expunging “the punishment” would be a constructive exclusion of the power. He doubted only the efficacy of the word “declare.”
Mr. WILSON was in favor of the motion. Strictness was not necessary in giving authority to enact penal laws; though necessary in enacting & expounding them.
On motion 12 for striking out “and punishment” as moved by Mr. Madison
N. H. no. Mas. ay. Ct. no. Pa. ay. Del. ay. Md. no. Va. ay. N. C. ay. S. C. ay. Geo. ay. 13
Mr. GOVr. MORRIS moved to strike out “declare the law” and insert “punish” before “piracies.” and on the question N. H. ay. Mas. ay. Ct. no. Pa. ay. Del. ay. Md. ay. Va. no. N. C. no. S. C. ay. Geo. ay. 14
Mr. MADISON, and Mr. RANDOLPH moved to insert, “define &,” before “punish.”
Mr. WILSON, thought “felonies” sufficiently defined by common law.
Mr. DICKENSON concurred with Mr. Wilson.
Mr. MERCER was in favor of the amendment.
Mr. MADISON. felony at common law is vague. It is also defective. One defect is supplied by Stat: of Anne as to running away with vessels which at common law was a breach of trust only. Besides no foreign law should be a standard farther than 15 is expressly adopted — If the laws of the States were to prevail on this subject, the citizens of different States would be subject to different punishments for the same offence at sea. There would be neither uniformity nor stability in the law — The proper remedy for all these difficulties was to vest the power proposed by the term “define” in the Natl. legislature.
Mr. GOVr. MORRIS would prefer designate to define, the latter being as he he conceived, limited to the preexisting meaning. — It was said by others to be applicable to the creating of offences also, and therefore suited the case both of felonies & of piracies. The motion of Mr. M. & Mr. R was agreed to.
Mr. ELSEWORTH enlarged the motion so as to read “to define and punish piracies and felonies committed on the high seas, counterfeiting the securities and current coin of the U. States, and offences agst. the law of Nations” which was agreed to nem. con.
16 “To subdue a rebellion in any State, on the application of its legislature.” 17
Mr. PINKNEY moved to strike out “on the application of its legislature”
Mr. GOVr. MORRIS 2ds.
Mr. L. MARTIN opposed it as giving a dangerous & unnecessary power. The consent of the State ought to precede the introduction of any extraneous force whatever.
Mr. MERCER supported the opposition of Mr. Martin.
Mr. ELSEWORTH proposed to add after “legislature” “or Executive.”
Mr. GOVr. MORRIS. The Executive may possibly be at the head of the Rebellion. The Genl. Govt. should enforce obedience in all cases where it may be necessary.
Mr. ELSEWORTH. In many cases The Genl. Govt. ought not to be able to interpose, unless called upon. He was willing to vary his motion so as to read, “or without it when the legislature cannot meet.”
Mr. GERRY was agst. letting loose the myrmidons of the U. States on a State without its own consent. The States will be the best Judges in such cases. More blood would have been spilt in Massts. in the late insurrection, if the Genl. authority had intermeddled.
Mr. LANGDON was for striking out as moved by Mr. Pinkney. The apprehension of the national force, will have a salutary effect in preventing insurrections.
Mr. RANDOLPH. If the Natl. Legislature is to judge whether the State legislature can or cannot meet, that amendment would make the clause as objectionable as the motion of Mr. Pinkney.
Mr. GOVr. MORRIS. We are acting a very strange part. We first form a strong man to protect us, and at the same time wish to tie his hands behind him, The legislature may surely be trusted with such a power to preserve the public tranquility.
On the motion to add “or without it [application] when the legislature cannot meet” 18
N. H. ay. Mas. no. Ct. ay. Pa. divd. Del. no. Md. no. Va. ay. N. C. divd. S. C. ay. Geo. ay. 19 So agreed to — 20
Mr. MADISON and Mr. DICKENSON moved to insert as explanatory, after “State” — “against the Government thereof” There might be a rebellion agst. the U. States — which 21 was Agreed to nem. con.
On the clause as amended N. H. ay. Mas *22 abst. Ct. ay. Pen. abst. Del. no. Md. no. Va. ay. N. C. no. S. C. no. Georg. ay — so it was lost. 23
24 “To make war”
Mr. PINKNEY opposed the vesting this power in the Legislature. Its proceedings were too slow. It would meet but once a year. The House of Representatives would be too numerous for such deliberations. The Senate would be the best depositary, being more acquainted with foreign affairs, and most capable of proper resolutions. If the States are equally represented in 25 Senate, so as to give no advantage to 25 large States, the power will notwithstanding be safe, as the small have their all at stake in such cases as well as the large States. It would be singular for one authority to make war, and another peace.
Mr. BUTLER. The objections against the Legislature lie in 26 great degree against the Senate. He was for vesting the power in the President, who will have all the requisite qualities, and will not make war but when the Nation will support it. Mr. MADISON and Mr. GERRY moved to insert “declare,” striking out “make” war; leaving to the Executive the power to repel sudden attacks.
Mr. SHARMAN thought it stood very well. The Executive shd. be able to repel and not to commence war. “Make” 27 better than “declare” the latter narrowing the power too much.
Mr. GERRY never expected to hear in a republic a motion to empower the Executive alone to declare war.
Mr. ELSWORTH. there is a material difference between the cases of making war and making peace. It should be more easy to get out of war, than into it. War also is a simple and overt declaration. peace attended with intricate & secret negotiations.
Mr. MASON was against giving the power of war to the Executive, because not safely to be trusted with it; or to the Senate, because not so constructed as to be entitled to it. He was for clogging rather than facilitating war; but for facilitating peace. He preferred “declare” to “make.”
On the motion to insert declare — in place of make, it was agreed to. N. H. no. Mas. abst. Cont. no. *29 Pa. ay. Del. ay. Md. ay. Va. ay. N. C. ay. S. C. ay. Geo. ay. 31
Mr. PINKNEY’s motion to strike out 32 whole clause, 33 disagreed to without call of States.
Mr. BUTLER moved to give the Legislature 32 power of peace, as they were to have that of war.
Mr. GERRY 2ds. him. 8 Senators may possibly exercise the power if vested in that body, and 14 if all should be present; and may consequently give up part of the U. States. The Senate are more liable to be corrupted by an Enemy than the whole Legislature.
On the motion for adding “and peace” after “war” 34 N. H. no. Mas. no. Ct. no. Pa. no. Del. no. Md. no. Va. no. N. C. no S. C. no. Geo. no. 35
1. See ante.
2. The word “was” is here inserted in the transcript.
3. The word “a” is here inserted in the transcript.
4. In the transcript the vote reads: “New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, aye — 7; Connecticut, New Jersey, Maryland, no — 3.”
5. In the transcript the vote reads: “Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, South Carolina, aye — 4; New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Virginia, North Carolina, Georgia, no — 6.”
6. The words “The clause” are here inserted in the transcript.
7. The word “was” is here inserted in the transcript.
8. The phrase “as also the clause” is here inserted in the transcript.
9. The words “do. do.” are omitted in the transcript.
10. The word “being” is here inserted in the transcript.
11. In the transcript the following phrase is here added: “after the words, ‘ To declare the law.”‘
12. The words “the question” are substituted in the transcript for “motion.”
13. In the transcript the vote reads: “Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, aye — 7; New Hampshire, Connecticut, Maryland, no — 3.”
14. In the transcript the vote reads: “New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, South Carolina, Georgia, aye — 7; Connecticut, Virginia, North Carolina, no — 3.”
15. The word “it” is here inserted in the transcript.
16. The words “The clause” are here inserted in the transcript.
17. The phrase “was next considered” is here inserted in the transcript.
18. The phrase “it was agreed to” is here added in the transcript.
19. In the transcript the vote reads: “New Hampshire, Connecticut, Virginia, South Carolina, Georgia, aye — 5; Massachusetts, Delaware, Maryland, no — 3; Pennsylvania, North Carolina, divided.”
20. The words “So agreed to” are omitted in the transcript.
21. The words “The motion” are substituted in the transcript for “which.”
*22. In the printed Journal, Mas. no.
23. In the transcript the vote reads: “New Hampshire, Connecticut, Virginia, Georgia, aye — 4; Delaware, Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, no — 4; Massachusetts, 22 Pennsylvania, absent. So it was lost.”
24. The words “The clause” are here inserted in the transcript.
25. The word “the” is here inserted in the transcript.
26. The word “a” is here inserted in the transcript.
27. The word “is” is here inserted in the transcript.
28. The transcript here inserts the following: “Connecticut voted in the negative; but.”
*29. On the remark by Mr. King that “make” war might be understood to “conduct” it which was an Executive function, Mr. Elseworth gave up his objection, and the vote of Cont. 30 was changed to — ay.
30. The words “of Cont. are omittd in the transcript.
31. In the transcript the vote reads: “Connecticut, *29 Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, aye — 8; New Hampshire, no — 1; Massachusetts, absent.”
32. The word “the” is here inserted in the transcript.
33. The word “was” is here inserted in the transcript.
34. The transcript here adds the following: “it was unanimously negatived.”
This version of “Madison’s Notes: Federal Convention of 1787: August 17,” which includes Steve Farrell’s “Editor’s Summary,” as well as several spelling modernizations and numerous shorthand alterations to full text, is Copyright © 2010 Steve Farrell and The Moral Liberal.