The Man Who Didn't Grow In Office — Lawrence Reed

Free Enterprise Zone, The Freeman, Lawrence W. Reed

Seven miles north of Escanaba in Michi­gan’s Upper Peninsula sits a little town with a very big name. More than a hun­dred years after the death of the town’s namesake it’s unlikely that many of today’s 5,000 residents of Gladstone could tell you much about him. But in the nineteenth cen­tury and for a long time thereafter, he was widely considered to be one of the world’s greatest statesmen.

Gladstone, Michigan, wasn’t always so named. It was originally christened “Minnewasca,” the Sioux Indian word for “White Water,” in 1887. Shortly thereafter, a local businessman pushed to rename the town after British Prime Minister William Ewart Glad­stone. A nearby railroad was partially funded by British capital and area residents appreci­ated the resulting economic development.

Just who was this son of Scottish parents who read 20,000 books in his lifetime and could speak Greek, Latin, Italian, and French, in addition to English? Biographer Philip Magnus wrote that “at the time of his death [1898] he was . . . the most venerated and influential statesman in the world.” Another biographer (who currently sits in Britain’s House of Lords), Roy Jenkins, declares that Gladstone “stamped the Victo­rian age even more than did [Queen] Victo­ria herself, and represented it almost as much.”

No individual in history had a longer or more distinguished career in the British gov­ernment: 62 years in the House of Com­mons; in charge of the nation’s finances as Chancellor of the Exchequer for 14 budgets in four administrations; leader of a major political party (the Liberals) for almost 40 years; four times prime minister, for a total of 12 years. Gladstone was 84 years old when he retired as P.M. in 1894, the oldest prime minister in British history. He was hailed as the “Grand Old Man” for his lead­ership and stature and as “England’s Great Commoner” because he was not of royal blood and refused to accept any titles of nobility. When he died, a quarter million cit­izens attended his funeral, one of the largest the country ever saw.

What made Gladstone both great and memorable was what he accomplished while he served in government. Biographer Mag­nus says that Gladstone “achieved unparal­leled success in his policy of setting the indi­vidual free from a multitude of obsolete restrictions.”

Today, when a citizen gets elected to make government smaller but ends up doing the opposite, the conventional wisdom credits him with having “grown in office.” Glad­stone’s philosophy evolved, but in precisely the opposite direction—from a hodgepodge of statist notions to principled liberty. He entered Parliament at age 22 in 1832 as a protectionist, a defender of the tax-subsidized Church of England, and an oppo­nent of reform. The eminent British histori­an Thomas Babington Macaulay described him as “the rising hope of the stern and
unbending Tories.”

Ardent Free Trader

By 1850 he had become an ardent free trader and by 1890 he was largely responsi­ble for reducing Britain’s tariffs from 1,200 to just 12. He slashed government spending, taxes, and regulations. He ended tax subsi­dies for the Church of England in Ireland. He pushed through reforms that allowed Jews and Catholics to serve in Parliament and that extended the vote to millions of taxpaying workers. He extolled the virtues of self-help and private charity.

Gladstone’s administrations were not paragons of unqualified libertarianism. In domestic policy he sometimes supported interventionist measures. But it is undeni­able that Britons were considerably freer when he died in 1898 than their fathers and grandfathers had been at the start of the century.

It wasn’t the instruction he received while a student at Oxford that converted Glad­stone to the liberation of the individual. Indeed, he offered this observation in later years: “I trace in the education of Oxford of my own time one great defect. Perhaps it was my own fault; but I must admit that I did not learn when at Oxford that which I have learned since—namely, to set a due value on the imperishable and inestimable principles of human liberty. The temper which, I think, too much prevailed in acade­mic circles was to regard liberty with jeal­ousy.” Anyone familiar with the prevailing orthodoxy of today’s academia would have to conclude that in this respect, the more things have changed the more they’ve stayed the same.

It was as president of the Board of Trade in the ministry of Sir Robert Peel in the 1840s that a young Gladstone came to champion free trade. The disastrous Irish potato famine was a powerful argument against laws forbidding the importation of grain for a starving populace.

Gladstone befriended the Anti-Corn Law League’s John Bright, became convinced of the logic of free trade, and secured the repeal of the protec­tionist Corn Laws over the objections of many in his own Conservative, or Tory, Party. The measure split the Conservatives, which paved the way for Gladstone and others a decade later to give birth to the Liberal Party.

Gladstone’s conversion to free trade made him a big name in liberal circles in Britain and a rising star abroad as well. His international reputation soared in 1851 when, after a visit to Naples, he revealed to the world the appalling conditions in Neapolitan prisons. Reformers there were being locked up for speaking out on behalf of freedom. Glad­stone’s vigorous denunciation reverberated around the globe and later prompted the Italian patriot Garibaldi to credit the British parliamentarian with having “sounded the first trumpet call of Italian liberty.”

In foreign policy, with a painful exception or two that he mostly later regretted, Glad­stone practiced retrenchment. He opposed the imperialist policies of his arch-rival Ben­jamin Disraeli. He said he preferred the Golden Rule over intervention. He fought hard but failed to secure Home Rule for Ire­land; if Parliament had been as wise as he on that issue, Ireland today might still be a part of the United Kingdom.

In February 1893, in his 83rd year, he delivered what one biographer terms “a lucid and brilliant speech” upholding the sanctity of sound money and the gold standard.

Gladstone often urged the British people to look to the ideas of America’s Founding Fathers for inspiration. “I was brought up to distrust and dislike liberty; I learned to believe in it,” he told a friend in 1891. “I view with the greatest alarm the progress of socialism at the present day,” he said. “Whatever influence I possess will be used in the direction of stopping it.”

Today, in little Gladstone, Michigan, a portrait of the Grand Old Man hangs in City Hall. The residents there can and should be very proud that their town’s name didn’t stay “Minnewasca” for long.

Lawrence W. Reed is the President of The Foundation for Economic Education.

Copyright 2009 @ Foundation for Economic Education. Used with permission.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here